Christian and I created two infographics that explored student tendencies of cheating and plagiarism in colleges and universities. We learned that a pretty good sized minority has committed a minor offense, such as copying some text from a source without citing it, and that larger offenses such as purchasing a full paper and passing it off as your own are much rarer. We also learned that students at schools with honor codes plagiarize more often and that students that plagiarize have much higher gpas.
The sources we used were http://www.caveon.com/resources/cheating-statistics/
Kerkvliet, J., & Sigmund, C. L. (1999). Can we control cheating in the classroom? Journal of Economic Education, 30(4), 331-351.
Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). “Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment.” Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187-203. (EJ 549 250) from the November 22, 1999 issue of U.S. News and World Report
Our group did a propaganda campaign opposing gun control laws. We found a good number of images that help portray our position on the subject. The pictures we chose use two different strategies, a satiric approach and a direct approach. We chose a fair amount of comedic pictures because satire is so useful for grabbing peoples attention and getting them to think about a subject. The serious pictures were used because this is a serious subject and should be treated as such. The point of those pictures was the hammer the point home that guns are important for protection. Here are two of the pictures we liked the best.
This is one of the biggest arguments of anti-gun control, that just because the average person can’t have a gun, doesn’t mean that will stop actual criminals with guns.
We liked this picture because it focuses on the idea of protecting your families, and particularly your kids, which relatable to everyone.
mostly reliable information
less information available
more information available
sometimes the information is less reliable because anyone can edit it
there is no practicality so far
not an actual name for it yet
Having your cell phone in your hand
Dragon Ball Z style capsules for easy storage
1. Tv ad’s, the daisy ad for example, which uses propaganda and (not so) subliminal messaging
2. Twitter, espn having live debates with analysts arguing which team will win an upcoming game and people tweeting a hashtag in support of either side
3. Music, artists making songs and lyrics supporting different causes such as political ideas or candidates
4. Internet sidebars, how google tracks where you visit online and uses that information to show ad’s that may relate to you
5. Website surveys, the website will have you fill out a form to hopefully gain useful and profitable information before you can use something on the website
I’m taking this class because I am interested in possibly taking the digital studies minor and I also enjoy classes like this with group projects taking advantage of the many cool technologies we have at the UMW like the 3d printer and the entire Convergence Center building. The topics that interest me the most are the SNL skit, newspaper, and something regarding cave paintings. The skit I think would be really fun, almost a game in a sense. As far as the newspaper, I think it would be really cool to possibly start something that every class after ours could follow. In addition, Dr. McClurken mentioned that he hoped our work would be going to people outside of the classroom, and that would be a good way for the whole school to see it. I like the idea of cave paintings because I like studying ancient history like that.
For our project, we 3D scanned several artifacts from the James Monroe Museum including Monroe’s Desk, a bas relief of Monroe’s negotiations regarding the Louisiana Purchase, and many other of the Monroe family’s personal possessions. It was really cool and fun to have the opportunity to work up close and personal with Jarod Kearney, the curator of the museum, and all of these objects. We got a behind the scenes look at many of them, which is an experience not many people get to have. To scan these objects, we learned how to use several different innovative tools and programs including Makerbot, Scanect, and Sketchfab. As interesting as it was to use these tools, technology was our biggest obstacle to completing our project. Due to these problems, we became good friends with Tim Owens of DTLT who’s help with these issues was invaluable. Our technology issues were the primary reason that we struggled to meet some our milestones stated in our contract. Thankfully, we anticipated that we would have some trouble, so we had contingency dates that we were able to meet. A vast majority of the time we spent on our project was during our several trips to the museum to scan. The scans take a good portion of time and are very easy to disrupt, so it was necessary to rescan just about every object. The scanners, the Makerbot in particular, are very sensitive, so anything that did not sit just right in the lasers, or was too shiny, or was not the right size were difficult to scan. The peace medal had each of these issues, so unfortunately we could not scan it. Due to the requirements of the scanners, we were not able to scan each of the original objects stated in our contract. We circumvented this problem by choosing some different objects.
As far as the individual responsibilities, non of the jobs stated in our contract went unfinished. Thanks to Ike, the timeline is completed and accurate, thanks to Victoria, the scans are all on the site and look excellent, I had the pleasure of interviewing Jarod and embedding the videos onto the site, and thanks to Amanda, everything on the site is consistent and looks professional. The primary part of our project was to scan the objects and put them online. The point of it is to enhance the museum experience and to be able to interact with some of the objects without even having to leave your desk. I mentioned that we could not scan all of the objects we originally hoped to scan, but we still fulfilled our contract by replacing the problem artifacts with others that worked. By working around the issues with technology, we completed everything by at least our back up dates, and accomplished what we set out to do in our contract. I think the four of us can now brag that we know James Monroe better than any of our friends.